This document contains proprietary information about Modulor, including product design, technical specifications, intellectual property, and business strategy. Please identify yourself and accept the terms below before proceeding.
Actuarial infrastructure for
musculoskeletal injury risk.
The hardware is the data layer. The data is the business.
Confidential — For potential partners only
The Problem
Strength has force plates. Speed has timing gates. Recovery has Normatec. But flexibility and joint mobility — the biggest levers for injury prevention — are still estimated by eye and documented on paper.
The full scope — every muscle group Modulor addresses:
• Muscle strains are the largest single injury category in elite football: hamstrings 42%, adductors 25%, quadriceps 19%, calves 14%. Re-injury rates: adductors 29%, hamstrings 30%. (Eirale et al., epidemiological review, Br J Sports Med)
• 25% of NFL players suffer a lower-extremity strain every season — 33% re-injury rate. (Jenkins et al., 12-year review of 2,101 NFL hamstring injuries, Orthop J Sports Med 2024)
• 21% of professional footballers suffer a groin/adductor injury every season; 68% are adductor-related. (Werner et al., 17-club 606-player UEFA prospective study, Br J Sports Med)
• Restricted hip internal rotation and ankle dorsiflexion are independent risk factors for ACL injury — 83% of studies in a 2,819-athlete systematic review confirmed the link. (Belkhelladi, Cierson & Martineau, Orthop J Sports Med 2025)
• Hamstring injuries have DOUBLED from 12% to 24% of all injuries in men's professional football over 21 years — training injuries rising 6.7% annually despite modern training science. (Ekstrand et al., UEFA Elite Club Injury Study, Br J Sports Med 2023)
• Economic impact: top LaLiga clubs lose €7M+ annually to muscle injuries; Premier League teams spent £266M total on sidelined players' wages in 2023/24 — £83M on hamstrings alone. (Melcón-Ballesteros et al., PLOS One 2024; Premier Injuries Ltd. 2024)
2
The Solution
Modulor is a single-station platform that perfects an athlete's ability to compete — applying precise motorized cable tension while measuring range of motion, force response, and movement quality in real time.
3
The Product
FIG. 2 — Apparatus Side-View Schematic
10 BLDC motor 12 Planetary gearbox 14 Cable spool 16 Inline load cell 18 Quick-release cuff 20 Depth camera 22 Touchscreen 24 E-stop 26 Frame + bench
Modulor is a single-station platform that applies precise, motorized cable tension to stretch an athlete's muscles while simultaneously measuring range of motion, force response, and movement quality — all in real time.
4
How It Works
FIG. 3 — Stretch Session Method (Bilateral Assessment Protocol)
Method claim: Steps 100–112 define the complete bilateral assessment and adaptive stretching protocol with longitudinal feedback loop.
5
Technology
FIG. 4 — Cable Drive Assembly
200W BLDC motor, 20:1 planetary gearbox, Dyneema cable. ODrive FOC controller at 100Hz. Force-compliant, backdriveable.
FIG. 5 — Sensor Array & Data Paths
Intel RealSense D435. 12-point skeletal tracking at 30fps. Inline load cell at 100Hz. Edge compute on Jetson module.
FIG. 6 — Control Interface Architecture
15" touchscreen. Real-time force graph, ROM tracking, bilateral comparison. Longitudinal trend view with export.
FIG. 7 — Five-Layer Safety Cascade
Software cap → PID compliance → slip clutch → E-stop → quick-release. Each layer is independent and fail-safe.
6
What It Measures
FIG. 8 — Measurement Extraction Pipeline (Raw Sensor → Derived Variables)
Apparatus claim: Three independent sensor inputs (40, 42, encoder) are fused at element 60 to derive nine biomechanical variables (V1–V9), fed to longitudinal risk scoring engine (62).
Peak passive ROM at standardized force. ±2° accuracy. Comparable across sessions.
Inline load cell at 100Hz. Logs tension ramp, peak force, and variability during hold.
Left vs. right at matched force. Flags differences >10%. Tracks resolution over time.
Duration at end-range without retreating. A neuromuscular tolerance metric.
Camera detects pelvic rotation, knee bend, trunk shift. Quantified, not eyeballed.
The force level where the athlete first reports discomfort or resists. Tracked over weeks.
Binary flag per rep. Correlated with force and ROM to build a tissue-response profile.
Rate of force acceptance during initial stretch. Indicates tissue readiness and stiffness.
Acute ROM gain per session. Chronic trend over weeks. The metric that matters most.
7
Competitive Landscape
Modulor is the only platform that occupies the upper-right quadrant — combining motorized, force-controlled stretching with real-time biomechanical measurement and longitudinal data tracking.
Clinical isokinetic. $100K+. Not designed for stretching protocols. No vision tracking.
Manual 1:1 service. $60/session. No measurement, no data, no consistency.
Compression recovery. No active stretch. No ROM measurement.
Subjective assessment. No force control, no objective measurement. Rarely documented longitudinally.
8
Market Opportunity
Stretching is the wedge. The product is a measurement + risk-pricing layer. Four independent buyers monetize the same underlying corpus.
Buyer 1 · Hardware lease
~800 addressable programs in NA + EU. Target $60K/yr/station. Every franchise has a training-room budget and an injury-prevention mandate.
Buyer 2 · Data licensing
$70B+ US market. MSK is ~40% of claims. Carriers buy aggregated risk signals, not hardware. Target: $250K–$1M per carrier / yr.
Buyer 3 · Enterprise
Roster-level availability models. Standardized injury reporting aligned to CBAs. Long sales cycle — large check.
Buyer 4 · Strategic exit
Patent + data corpus are the asset. Acquisition-optimized. Adjacent distribution already owns the consumer surface.
~800K MSK injuries/yr across active-duty — 100× pro sport. AFWERX + SOFWERX + DIU are parallel rails, not a pivot. See Doc 19 →
Lease-only model. Every install compounds the data corpus. Physical switching cost protects the moat once deployed.
9
Military / DoD Pathway
MSK injury is the #1 cause of lost duty days across every service branch. ~800K/yr active-duty MSK injuries; $3.7B annual cost. We pursue this in parallel to commercial — funded by the government, not the seed.
Pathway 1 · 90-day yes
Open Topic quarterly. $75K Phase I (3 mo) → $1.7M Phase II (9 mo) → $15M STRATFI. Target sponsor: PJ / combat controller / pilot training units.
Pathway 2 · Best-paying pilot
Tier-1 operators = closest analog to pro athletes. CRADA + funded pilot via Tech Experimentation event. $250K–$3M, 90–180 days.
Pathway 3 · Biggest check
Dual-use commercial-first. $1–20M prototype awards. Unlocked after first commercial pilot revenue. Target: Year 2.
Pathway 4 · Validation
Peer-reviewed ROM/asymmetry → MSK injury prediction paper. Unlocks insurance licensing narrative. 6–24 mo, $500K–$10M R&D.
Same hardware. Protocol library + unit-aggregated dashboards + IL-4 gov cloud path. ~2 person-weeks of integration per pathway.
"$3M + $500K non-dilutive Phase I" = smarter capital + diversified buyer + de-risked insurance narrative. Full plan in Doc 19.
9b
Product Roadmap
FIG. 9 — Multi-Pattern Reconfigurable Platform (Single Frame, Seven Patterns)
Apparatus claim: A single motorized cable platform (elements 10, 34, 38) serves seven distinct stretch patterns through athlete repositioning (V1) and adjustable pulley position on a sliding track (V2), without changing the drive system.
V1 — Launch
Same motor, same cable, same pulley for all four. The athlete changes position — the machine stays simple.
V2 — Year 2
Requires adjustable pulley position on frame (sliding track). Same motor and cable system. Software update + hardware bracket.
10
Intellectual Property · Patent Pending
USPTO Provisional Application 64/040,028 · filed April 15, 2026 · 35 U.S.C. § 111(b)
FIG. 1 — System Block Diagram (Force-Controlled Stretch with Compensation-Aware Adjustment)
System claim: Elements 200–214 define the complete closed-loop system. The red dashed path (210 → 204) represents the novel compensation-aware force adjustment — vision-detected compensation modifies the PID setpoint in real time.
FIG. 10 — PID Force-Compliance Control Loop (Element 204 Detail)
Method claim: The PID controller (204) maintains force setpoint while the compensation signal from the vision system (210) dynamically modifies the target, creating a dual-feedback architecture unique to this apparatus.
FIG. 11 — Compensation Detection & Adaptive Force Response (Element 210 Detail)
Method claim: The compensation classifier (224) analyzes pose data to detect pelvic rotation, knee bend, or trunk shift, then proportionally reduces force setpoint — the core novel mechanism that distinguishes Modulor from all existing stretch devices.
A method for force-controlled stretching with compensation-aware adjustment, comprising: applying motorized cable tension via PID force control (204), detecting movement compensation via depth-camera pose estimation (210, 224), and dynamically modifying the force setpoint in response to detected compensation.
An integrated cable-drive and vision feedback stretching apparatus comprising: a motorized spool (34) with inline force sensing (42), a depth camera (40) with skeletal tracking (220), a PID compliance controller (204), and a compensation classifier (224) that adjusts cable tension in real time.
A bilateral assessment and adaptive protocol system comprising: standardized force application (F_set), bilateral ROM comparison (Δ = |θ_L − θ_R|), longitudinal trend analysis with injury risk scoring (62), and adaptive protocol modification (214) based on historical session data.
Figures 1–11 document the complete system. Prior art gap is strong — no existing device combines motorized cable stretching with real-time vision-based compensation detection and adaptive force modification.
11
Revenue Model
12
Growth Engine
13
Integration Layer
We do not build our own AMS, programming app, or wearable. Every existing platform is a pipe we feed. That's how the hardware becomes infrastructure, not a sensor.
Tier 1 · V1 must-haves
Pilot gate: "we use X" cannot be a reason we lose the deal.
Tier 2 · 6-month unlock
Each unlocks a specific buyer category.
Carriers don't integrate with point tools. They license aggregated, anonymized risk signals via data-licensing APIs. Target: $250K–$1M / carrier / yr after Year 2. No claims-system integration needed — just signed BAAs and a data feed.
Never write bespoke code for one customer. Every integration is a reusable template. Every custom request gets redirected to the public REST API + webhook pattern. Cheap per customer, compounding over time.
Data-rights clause in every lease contract. Teams get their data back into their AMS; we retain the de-identified corpus in perpetuity. This is the insurance-licensing precondition. Full plan: Doc 20.
13b
Capital Requirements
30-month runway. 5–8 pilot stations deployed. Patent utility conversion. Path to Series A on $2–4M ARR + insurance LOI.
ARR Projection by Installed Units
Active Units Installed
$3M seed gets Modulor through 5–8 pilot deployments, utility patent conversion, first insurance data-licensing LOI, and AFWERX Phase I submission → Series A at $2–4M ARR + corpus of 25K+ athlete-months.
14
The Ask
The thesis is defined. The IP is filed. The product is scoped. We are raising the smallest round that buys 30 months and the right partners on the cap table.
Seat 1 · Anchor
One strategic who brings distribution or a data-licensing pathway. Hyperice, Therabody, Catapult, Nike, a major insurance carrier, or a sports-specific fund with operator relationships.
Seat 2 · Partner
A fund with explicit sports/health thesis and warm intros to pro + collegiate training rooms. Will lead or co-lead. Brings deal flow on future strategics.
Seat 3 · Signal
Active and retired pro athletes + performance directors who take small positions and become public advocates. Signaling asset worth more than the check.
Direct: hello@modulor.example · Data room: hub.html · Reply within 48 hours.
15
Controlled tension. Measured range. Data on every rep.
Confidential — 2026